### Install the package Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/paper_revision_bench/README.md Install the library via pip. ```bash pip install paper-revision-bench ``` -------------------------------- ### Install and initialize the package Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/xtragpt-paper-revision-skill/README.md Install the npm package and initialize the project structure. ```bash npm install xtragpt-paper-revision-skill npx xtragpt-paper-revision-skill init ``` -------------------------------- ### Setup AlpacaEval for Component-wise Evaluation Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md Clones the AlpacaEval repository, installs dependencies, and applies custom configurations for paper revision tasks. ```bash # Clone and install AlpacaEval git clone https://github.com/tatsu-lab/alpaca_eval.git cd alpaca_eval && pip install -e . # Copy our modified configs cp -r ../6_component_evaluation/alpaca_eval_gpt4_turbo_fn/* \ src/alpaca_eval/evaluators_configs/alpaca_eval_gpt4_turbo_fn/ ``` ```bash cp 6_component_evaluation/glm_winrate.py $(python -c "import alpaca_eval; print(alpaca_eval.__path__[0])")/metrics/glm_winrate.py ``` -------------------------------- ### Setup AI-Scientist for Full Paper Evaluation Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md Clones and installs the AI-Scientist repository for full paper evaluation. ```bash git clone https://github.com/SakanaAI/AI-Scientist.git cd AI-Scientist && pip install -e . ``` -------------------------------- ### Reproduce the demo locally Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/xtragpt-paper-revision-skill/README.md Commands to start the local server, run the demo script, and replay the session. ```bash # from repo root bash tests/openclaw-demo/start_vllm.sh # serves XtraGPT-7B on :8088 and Qwen2.5-7B on :8089 python tests/openclaw-demo/run_demo.py # runs the three backends with the skill's prompt template asciinema play tests/openclaw-demo/demo.cast # replay the recorded session ``` -------------------------------- ### Install AlpacaEval Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/6_component_evaluation/README.md Clone the AlpacaEval repository and install it in editable mode. ```bash git clone https://github.com/tatsu-lab/alpaca_eval.git cd alpaca_eval pip install -e . ``` -------------------------------- ### Install XtraGPT dependencies Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md Clone the repository and install the required Python packages. ```bash # Clone repository git clone https://github.com/Xtra-Computing/XtraGPT.git cd XtraGPT # Install dependencies pip install -r requirements.txt # For training, also install LLaMA-Factory pip install llamafactory ``` -------------------------------- ### Install AI-Scientist Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/full_paper_evaluation/README.md Clone the repository and install the package in editable mode to set up the environment. ```bash git clone https://github.com/SakanaAI/AI-Scientist.git cd AI-Scientist pip install -e . ``` -------------------------------- ### Install LLaMA-Factory Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/train/README.md Install the required LLaMA-Factory package via pip. ```bash pip install llamafactory ``` -------------------------------- ### Quick Start evaluation Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/paper_revision_bench/README.md Perform a basic evaluation of revised text against original text using a judge model. ```python from paper_revision_bench import evaluate results = evaluate( original_texts=["The dominant sequence transduction models are based on complex recurrent or convolutional neural networks."], revised_texts=["Sequence transduction models typically use complex RNNs or CNNs."], section="abstract", judge_model="gpt-4-1106-preview", # matches paper api_key="sk-xxx", # or set OPENAI_API_KEY env var ) print(f"Win Rate: {results.win_rate:.1%}") print(results.summary()) ``` -------------------------------- ### Evaluate Models with paper-revision-bench Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md Example of running an evaluation using GPT-4-Turbo as a judge. ```python import paper_revision_bench as prb # Prepare your data samples = [ { "instruction": "Improve the clarity of this title", "input": "A Study of Neural Networks", "output_1": "Deep Learning for Image Classification", # Model A output "output_2": "Neural Network Analysis Study", # Model B output } ] # Run evaluation with GPT-4-Turbo as judge results = prb.evaluate( samples=samples, judge="openai/gpt-4-turbo", criteria="clarity" ) print(f"Model A win rate: {results.win_rate:.1%}") ``` -------------------------------- ### Evaluation Output Format Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/6_component_evaluation/README.md Example of the JSON structure produced by the evaluation process. ```json { "win_rate": 65.2, "standard_error": 1.3, "n_total": 1400 } ``` -------------------------------- ### Scaffold into a specific directory Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/xtragpt-paper-revision-skill/README.md Initialize the package in a custom project path. ```bash npx xtragpt-paper-revision-skill init --dir /path/to/project ``` -------------------------------- ### Run training with scripts or CLI Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md Execute training using the provided shell script or the LLaMA-Factory CLI. ```bash # Set environment variables export MODEL_PATH="Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct" # Base model export OUTPUT_DIR="./output/xtragpt-7b" # Output directory # Run training bash scripts/train.sh ``` ```bash llamafactory-cli train configs/train_config.yaml ``` -------------------------------- ### Overwrite existing files Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/xtragpt-paper-revision-skill/README.md Force initialization to overwrite existing configuration files. ```bash npx xtragpt-paper-revision-skill init --force ``` -------------------------------- ### Train using LLaMA-Factory CLI Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/train/README.md Execute training directly using the LLaMA-Factory CLI with a specified configuration file. ```bash llamafactory-cli train ../configs/train_config.yaml ``` -------------------------------- ### Configure Dataset Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/train/README.md Copy the dataset configuration file to the LLaMA-Factory data directory. ```bash cp data/data.json /path/to/LLaMA-Factory/data/dataset_info.json ``` -------------------------------- ### Train using provided script Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/train/README.md Set environment variables for the model path and output directory before executing the training script. ```bash # Set your base model and output directory export MODEL_PATH="Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct" export OUTPUT_DIR="./output/xtragpt-7b" bash ../scripts/train.sh ``` -------------------------------- ### Set environment variables Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/xtragpt-paper-revision-skill/README.md Configure the base URL and API key for the XtraGPT service before running OpenClaw. ```bash export XTRAGPT_BASE_URL=http://127.0.0.1:8088/v1 export XTRAGPT_API_KEY=dummy ``` -------------------------------- ### Project Structure Overview Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md Visual representation of the XtraGPT repository file structure. ```text XtraGPT/ ├── configs/ │ ├── train_config.yaml # Training configuration │ └── dataset_info.json # Dataset configuration for LLaMA-Factory ├── scripts/ │ ├── train.sh # Training script │ └── predict.sh # Inference script ├── 6_component_evaluation/ # Component-wise evaluation │ ├── alpaca_eval_gpt4_turbo_fn/ │ ├── convert_predictions.py │ └── run_eval.sh ├── full_paper_evaluation/ # Full paper evaluation │ ├── ai_scientist_eval.py │ ├── analyze_results.py │ └── paper_results/ ├── train/ │ ├── data/ │ └── README.md ├── examples/ │ └── inference_example.py ├── xtragpt-paper-revision-skill/ │ └── skills/skill.xtragpt-paper-revision-skill.yaml ├── requirements.txt └── README.md ``` -------------------------------- ### Recommended Usage Pattern Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md The standard workflow for combining general LLMs with XtraGPT for academic writing. ```text General LLM → drafting / reasoning XtraGPT → in-context revision / alignment ``` -------------------------------- ### Scaffolded file structure Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/xtragpt-paper-revision-skill/README.md The directory structure created by the initialization command. ```text openclaw/ ├── openclaw.config.example.yaml ├── providers/ │ └── provider.xtragpt.yaml ├── routers/ │ └── router.auto_route_rules.yaml └── skills/ └── skill.xtragpt-paper-revision-skill.yaml ``` -------------------------------- ### CLI Commands Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md Command line interface for running evaluations and listing supported configurations. ```APIDOC ## paper-revision-bench evaluate Runs evaluation from a JSON input file. - **--input**: Path to JSON file. - **--judge**: Model ID of the judge. - **--criteria**: Evaluation criteria. - **--output**: Path to save results. ## paper-revision-bench list-criteria Lists all available evaluation criteria. ## paper-revision-bench list-judges Lists all supported LLM judges. ``` -------------------------------- ### Run Component-wise Evaluation Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md Executes the evaluation script after setting the required OpenAI API key. ```bash export OPENAI_API_KEY="your-api-key" bash 6_component_evaluation/run_eval.sh \ ./formatted_predictions/xtragpt \ ./formatted_predictions/baseline \ ./eval_results ``` -------------------------------- ### XtraGPT Workflow Visualization Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md A diagram illustrating the request routing process from the agent to the XtraGPT revision skill. ```text User request ↓ Agent router detects "revision intent" ↓ xtragpt-paper-revision-skill skill ↓ XtraGPT ↓ Revised academic text ``` -------------------------------- ### Analyze Before/After Improvements Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/full_paper_evaluation/README.md Compare evaluation results from two different JSON files to quantify improvements. ```bash python analyze_results.py \ --before before_revision_scores.json \ --after after_revision_scores.json \ --output analysis.json ``` -------------------------------- ### User Prompt for Model Ranking Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/6_component_evaluation/alpaca_eval_gpt4_turbo_fn/modified_alpaca_eval_fn.txt Provides the instruction and model outputs to be evaluated, requesting a structured JSON output. ```json ## Prompt { "instruction": """{instruction}""", } ## Model Outputs Here are the unordered outputs from the models. Each output is associated with a specific model, identified by a unique model identifier. { { "model": "m", "output": """{output_1}""" }, { "model": "M", "output": """{output_2}""" } } ## Task Evaluate and rank the models based on the quality and relevance of their outputs. The ranking should be such that the model with the highest quality output is ranked first. ``` -------------------------------- ### Run Evaluation Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/6_component_evaluation/README.md Execute the evaluation script comparing model output against a baseline. ```bash bash run_eval.sh \ /path/to/model/formatted \ /path/to/baseline/formatted \ /path/to/output ``` -------------------------------- ### Run Inference with XtraGPT Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md Loads an XtraGPT model and tokenizer, formats input using the required prompt template, and generates a response. ```python import torch from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer # Select the model size: "XtraGPT-1.5B", "XtraGPT-3B", "XtraGPT-7B", or "XtraGPT-14B" model_name = "Xtra-Computing/XtraGPT-7B" tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name) model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained( model_name, torch_dtype=torch.float16, device_map="auto" ) # Define the Prompt Template tailored for XtraGPT prompt_template = """Act as an expert model for improving articles **PAPER_CONTENT**. The output needs to answer the **QUESTION** on **SELECTED_CONTENT** in the input. Avoid adding unnecessary length, unrelated details, overclaims, or vague statements. Focus on clear, concise, and evidence-based improvements that align with the overall context of the paper. {paper_content} {selected_content} {user_question} """ # Example Data (from the "Attention Is All You Need" paper) paper_content = "The dominant sequence transduction models are based on complex recurrent or convolutional neural networks in an encoder-decoder configuration. The best performing models also connect the encoder and decoder through an attention mechanism. We propose a new simple network architecture, the Transformer, based solely on attention mechanisms, dispensing with recurrence and convolutions entirely. Experiments on two machine translation tasks show these models to be superior in quality while being more parallelizable and requiring significantly less time to train." selected_content = "The dominant sequence transduction models are based on complex recurrent or convolutional neural networks in an encoder-decoder configuration." user_question = "help me make it more concise." # Format the input formatted_prompt = prompt_template.format( paper_content=paper_content, selected_content=selected_content, user_question=user_question ) messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": formatted_prompt} ] # Apply chat template text = tokenizer.apply_chat_template( messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True ) model_inputs = tokenizer([text], return_tensors="pt").to(model.device) # Generate generated_ids = model.generate( **model_inputs, max_new_tokens=16384, temperature=0.1 ) generated_ids = [ output_ids[len(input_ids):] for input_ids, output_ids in zip(model_inputs.input_ids, generated_ids) ] response = tokenizer.batch_decode(generated_ids, skip_special_tokens=True)[0] print(response) ``` -------------------------------- ### Basic Evaluation Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/paper_revision_bench/README.md Perform a standard evaluation with optional instructions. ```python from paper_revision_bench import evaluate results = evaluate( original_texts=["Original text 1", "Original text 2"], revised_texts=["Revised text 1", "Revised text 2"], instructions=["Improve clarity", "Improve clarity"], # optional section="abstract", # title, abstract, introduction, background, evaluation, conclusion judge_model="gpt-4-1106-preview", ) ``` -------------------------------- ### Copy Modified Configs Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/6_component_evaluation/README.md Replace default AlpacaEval configurations with project-specific versions. ```bash cp -r alpaca_eval_configs/* \ /path/to/alpaca_eval/src/alpaca_eval/evaluators_configs/alpaca_eval_gpt4_turbo_fn/ ``` -------------------------------- ### CLI Usage for Evaluation Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md Commands for running evaluations and listing available criteria or judges via the CLI. ```bash # Evaluate from JSON file paper-revision-bench evaluate \ --input samples.json \ --judge openai/gpt-4-turbo \ --criteria clarity \ --output results.json # List available criteria and judges paper-revision-bench list-criteria paper-revision-bench list-judges ``` -------------------------------- ### Set OpenAI API Key Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/full_paper_evaluation/README.md Configure the environment variable required for LLM-based evaluation. ```bash export OPENAI_API_KEY="your-api-key" ``` -------------------------------- ### Detailed Reports Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/paper_revision_bench/README.md Access evaluation metrics and export results to files. ```python results = evaluate(...) print(results.win_rate) # 0.85 print(results.lose_rate) # 0.10 print(results.tie_rate) # 0.05 for detail in results.details: print(f"Sample {detail.index}: {detail.winner} - {detail.explanation}") results.to_json("report.json") results.to_csv("report.csv") ``` -------------------------------- ### Define Evaluation Prompt Structure Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/6_component_evaluation/alpaca_eval_gpt4_turbo_fn/alpaca_eval_fn.txt The instruction field expects the prompt text used to generate the model responses. ```json { "instruction": """{instruction}""", } ``` -------------------------------- ### Generate Predictions Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/6_component_evaluation/README.md Run inference using the XtraGPT model to generate prediction files. ```bash # Using XtraGPT MODEL_PATH="Xtra-Computing/XtraGPT-7B" bash ../../scripts/predict.sh ``` -------------------------------- ### Citation Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/paper_revision_bench/README.md BibTeX citation for the XtraGPT paper. ```bibtex @misc{nuo2025xtragpt, title={XtraGPT: LLMs for Human-AI Collaboration on Controllable Academic Paper Revision}, author={Nuo Chen and Andre Lin HuiKai and Jiaying Wu and Junyi Hou and Zining Zhang and Qian Wang and Xidong Wang and Bingsheng He}, year={2025}, eprint={2505.11336}, archivePrefix={arXiv}, primaryClass={cs.CL}, } ``` -------------------------------- ### Run Full Paper Evaluation Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md Executes the AI-Scientist evaluation script on a specific paper PDF. ```bash export OPENAI_API_KEY="your-api-key" python full_paper_evaluation/ai_scientist_eval.py \ --paper_path ./papers/my_paper.pdf \ --output ./review_results.json \ --model "gpt-4o" ``` -------------------------------- ### Convert Predictions for Evaluation Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md Formats prediction files for the evaluation pipeline using the conversion script. ```bash python 6_component_evaluation/convert_predictions.py \ --input_dir ./predictions \ --output_dir ./formatted_predictions \ --model_name "XtraGPT-7B" ``` -------------------------------- ### Convert Predictions to AlpacaEval Format Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/6_component_evaluation/README.md Transform prediction files into the format expected by the evaluation framework. ```bash python convert_predictions.py \ --input_dir /path/to/predictions \ --output_dir /path/to/formatted \ --model_name "XtraGPT-7B" ``` -------------------------------- ### Configure self-hosted XtraGPT endpoint Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/xtragpt-paper-revision-skill/README.md Define the provider configuration for an OpenAI-compatible XtraGPT endpoint. ```yaml model: provider: openai_compatible base_url: http://127.0.0.1:8088/v1 model: Xtra-Computing/XtraGPT-7B ``` -------------------------------- ### Retrieve Paper-Specific Prompts Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md Access predefined evaluation prompts for specific paper sections. ```python from paper_revision_bench import get_paper_eval_prompt, list_paper_sections # Available sections: title, abstract, introduction, background, evaluation, conclusion print(list_paper_sections()) # Get the evaluation prompt for a specific section prompt = get_paper_eval_prompt("title") ``` -------------------------------- ### Evaluate a Single Paper Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/full_paper_evaluation/README.md Run the evaluation script on a specific PDF file and save the output to a JSON file. ```bash python ai_scientist_eval.py \ --paper_path ./my_paper.pdf \ --output ./review.json \ --model gpt-4o ``` -------------------------------- ### Async Batch Evaluation Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/paper_revision_bench/README.md Run evaluations concurrently using asyncio. ```python from paper_revision_bench import evaluate_async import asyncio async def main(): results = await evaluate_async( original_texts=large_original_list, revised_texts=large_revised_list, section="introduction", max_concurrent=5, ) print(results.summary()) asyncio.run(main()) ``` -------------------------------- ### Served provider model name Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/xtragpt-paper-revision-skill/README.md The specific model name expected by the provider. ```text Xtra-Computing/XtraGPT-7B ``` -------------------------------- ### Paper-Specific Prompt Utilities Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md Functions to retrieve evaluation prompts and list available paper sections. ```APIDOC ## list_paper_sections() Returns a list of available paper sections for evaluation. ## get_paper_eval_prompt(section) Returns the evaluation prompt template for a specific paper section (e.g., 'title', 'abstract'). ``` -------------------------------- ### evaluate_async() Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/paper_revision_bench/README.md Performs an asynchronous batch evaluation of revised texts. ```APIDOC ## evaluate_async(original_texts, revised_texts, section='abstract', max_concurrent=5) ### Description Asynchronously evaluates large batches of text revisions. ### Parameters - **original_texts** (List[str]) - Required - Baseline texts. - **revised_texts** (List[str]) - Required - Revised texts. - **section** (str) - Optional - Paper section. Default: "abstract". - **max_concurrent** (int) - Optional - Concurrent API calls. Default: 5. ### Returns - **EvaluationResult** - An object containing evaluation metrics. ``` -------------------------------- ### Define Model Outputs Structure Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/6_component_evaluation/alpaca_eval_gpt4_turbo_fn/alpaca_eval_fn.txt The model outputs are provided as a set of objects, each containing a model identifier and the corresponding output text. ```json { { "model": "m", "output": """{output_1}""" }, { "model": "M", "output": """{output_2}""" } } ``` -------------------------------- ### System Prompt for LLM Evaluation Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/6_component_evaluation/alpaca_eval_gpt4_turbo_fn/modified_alpaca_eval_fn.txt Defines the role of the evaluator to rank model responses based on human preference. ```text <|im_start|>system You are a highly efficient assistant, who evaluates and rank large language models (LLMs) based on the quality of their responses to given prompts. This process will create a leaderboard reflecting the most accurate and human-preferred answers. <|im_end|> ``` -------------------------------- ### evaluate() Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/paper_revision_bench/README.md Performs a synchronous evaluation of revised texts against original texts using a specified judge model. ```APIDOC ## evaluate(original_texts, revised_texts, instructions=None, section='abstract', judge_model='gpt-4-1106-preview', api_key=None, temperature=0.0, max_tokens=200, max_concurrent=5) ### Description Evaluates the quality of revised texts compared to original baseline texts using an LLM judge. ### Parameters - **original_texts** (List[str]) - Required - Baseline texts (model "m" / output_1). - **revised_texts** (List[str]) - Required - Model outputs to evaluate (model "M" / output_2). - **instructions** (List[str]) - Optional - Revision instructions per sample. - **section** (str) - Optional - Paper section (title, abstract, introduction, background, evaluation, conclusion). Default: "abstract". - **judge_model** (str) - Optional - OpenAI model to use for judging. Default: "gpt-4-1106-preview". - **api_key** (str) - Optional - OpenAI API key. - **temperature** (float) - Optional - Default: 0.0. - **max_tokens** (int) - Optional - Default: 200. - **max_concurrent** (int) - Optional - Concurrent API calls. Default: 5. ### Returns - **EvaluationResult** - An object containing win/loss/tie rates and detailed metrics. ``` -------------------------------- ### prb.evaluate(samples, judge, criteria) Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/README.md Evaluates model outputs using a specified judge and criteria. ```APIDOC ## prb.evaluate ### Description Evaluates a list of samples using an LLM judge to determine model performance based on specific criteria. ### Parameters - **samples** (list) - Required - A list of dictionaries containing 'instruction', 'input', 'output_1', and 'output_2'. - **judge** (string) - Required - The model ID of the judge (e.g., 'openai/gpt-4-turbo'). - **criteria** (string) - Required - The evaluation criteria (e.g., 'clarity'). ### Returns - **results** (object) - An object containing evaluation metrics such as 'win_rate'. ``` -------------------------------- ### Length-Controlled Win Rate Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/paper_revision_bench/README.md Calculate length-controlled win rate to account for length bias. ```bash pip install paper-revision-bench[alpaca] ``` ```python lc = results.length_controlled_winrate(model_name="XtraGPT-7B", baseline_name="original") print(f"LC Win Rate: {lc['length_controlled_winrate']:.1f}% ± {lc['lc_standard_error']:.1f}%") ``` -------------------------------- ### compute_weighted_overall() Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/paper_revision_bench/README.md Computes an overall win rate as a weighted average across different paper sections. ```APIDOC ## compute_weighted_overall(section_results) ### Description Calculates the weighted overall win rate based on results from multiple paper sections. ### Parameters - **section_results** (dict) - Required - A dictionary mapping section names to their respective EvaluationResult objects. ``` -------------------------------- ### Skill ID Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/xtragpt-paper-revision-skill/README.md The identifier used for router rules or manual skill invocations. ```text xtragpt-paper-revision-skill ``` -------------------------------- ### Weighted Overall Score Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/paper_revision_bench/README.md Compute a weighted win rate across multiple paper sections. ```python from paper_revision_bench import evaluate, compute_weighted_overall section_results = {} for section in ["title", "abstract", "introduction", "background", "evaluation", "conclusion"]: section_results[section] = evaluate( original_texts=original_list, revised_texts=revised_list, section=section, ) overall = compute_weighted_overall(section_results) print(f"Overall Win Rate: {overall['weighted_win_rate']:.1%}") ``` -------------------------------- ### AlpacaEval Evaluation Input Structure Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/6_component_evaluation/alpaca_eval_gpt4_turbo_fn/alpaca_eval_fn_evaluation.txt Defines the JSON schema for providing instructions and model outputs to the evaluation function. ```json { "instruction": """{instruction}""", } ``` ```json { { "model": "m", "output": """{output_1}""" }, { "model": "M", "output": """{output_2}""" } } ``` -------------------------------- ### OpenClaw model ID Source: https://github.com/xtra-computing/xtragpt/blob/main/xtragpt-paper-revision-skill/README.md The identifier for the model within OpenClaw. ```text xtragpt-7b ``` === COMPLETE CONTENT === This response contains all available snippets from this library. No additional content exists. Do not make further requests.