### End-to-End Example with TF-IDF Similarity Source: https://context7.com/ishitatakeshi/truthfinder/llms.txt Demonstrates the full workflow of TruthFinder, including TF-IDF-based similarity for handling variations in fact names. Requires setup with pandas, numpy, and scikit-learn. ```python import pandas as pd import numpy as np from numpy.linalg import norm from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer from truthdiscovery import TruthFinder # Input data with variations in naming dataframe = pd.DataFrame([ ["a", "Einstein", "Special relativity"], ["a", "Newton", "Universal gravitation"], ["b", "Albert Einstein", "Special relativity"], # Same as "Einstein" ["b", "Galileo Galilei", "Heliocentrism"], ["c", "Newton", "Special relativity"], ["c", "Galilei", "Universal gravitation"], # Similar to "Galileo Galilei" ["c", "Einstein", "Heliocentrism"] ], columns=["website", "fact", "object"]) # Build TF-IDF vectorizer on all facts vectorizer = TfidfVectorizer(min_df=1) vectorizer.fit(dataframe["fact"]) def similarity(w1, w2): """Compute cosine similarity between two text strings""" V = vectorizer.transform([w1, w2]) v1, v2 = np.asarray(V.todense()) return np.dot(v1, v2) / (norm(v1) * norm(v2)) def implication(f1, f2): """Implication function: how much f1 supports f2""" return similarity(f1.lower(), f2.lower()) # Create and train finder finder = TruthFinder(implication, dampening_factor=0.8, influence_related=0.6) print("Initial state:") print(dataframe) # Train the model result = finder.train(dataframe) print("\nEstimation result:") print(result) # Analyze results: identify most trustworthy sources trustworthiness = result.drop_duplicates("website")[["website", "trustworthiness"]] print("\nSource trustworthiness ranking:") print(trustworthiness.sort_values("trustworthiness", ascending=False)) # Identify highest confidence facts per object for obj in result["object"].unique(): obj_facts = result[result["object"] == obj] best_fact = obj_facts.loc[obj_facts["fact_confidence"].idxmax()] print(f"\n{obj}: {best_fact['fact']} (confidence: {best_fact['fact_confidence']:.4f})") ``` -------------------------------- ### Setup Data and Run TruthFinder Source: https://context7.com/ishitatakeshi/truthfinder/llms.txt This snippet demonstrates how to set up a pandas DataFrame with fact confidence values and then use the TruthFinder to update website trustworthiness. Ensure the TruthFinder class and pandas are imported. ```python import pandas as pd from truthdiscovery import TruthFinder # Setup data with known fact confidence values dataframe = pd.DataFrame([ ["site_a", "Einstein", "Special relativity"], ["site_a", "Newton", "Universal gravitation"], ["site_b", "Einstein", "Special relativity"], ["site_b", "Galilei", "Heliocentrism"], ["site_c", "Newton", "Special relativity"], ["site_c", "Galilei", "Universal gravitation"], ["site_c", "Einstein", "Heliocentrism"] ], columns=["website", "fact", "object"]) # Pre-set fact confidence scores (simulating after confidence calculation) dataframe["trustworthiness"] = 0.9 dataframe["fact_confidence"] = [0.9, 0.8, 0.9, 0.7, 0.3, 0.4, 0.2] def implication(f1, f2): return 1 finder = TruthFinder(implication, dampening_factor=0.3, influence_related=0.5) # Update trustworthiness based on fact confidence # Trustworthiness = mean(fact_confidence) for all facts from that source result = finder.update_website_trustworthiness(dataframe.copy()) # Check results for site in ["site_a", "site_b", "site_c"]: trust = result[result["website"] == site]["trustworthiness"].iloc[0] facts = result[result["website"] == site]["fact_confidence"].values print(f"{site}: trustworthiness={trust:.2f} (mean of {facts})") ``` -------------------------------- ### Updating Website Trustworthiness with update_website_trustworthiness() Source: https://context7.com/ishitatakeshi/truthfinder/llms.txt Recalculates website trustworthiness based on the average confidence of facts provided by each source. Requires pandas, numpy, and TruthFinder. ```python import pandas as pd import numpy as np from truthdiscovery import TruthFinder ``` -------------------------------- ### Internal Methods: calculate_confidence() and adjust_confidence() Source: https://context7.com/ishitatakeshi/truthfinder/llms.txt Illustrates the internal confidence calculation methods. `calculate_confidence` computes initial scores based on source trustworthiness, and `adjust_confidence` refines them by considering related facts. Requires pandas, numpy, and math. ```python import pandas as pd import numpy as np import math from truthdiscovery import TruthFinder # Setup test data with pre-initialized trustworthiness dataframe = pd.DataFrame([ ["a", "Einstein", "Special relativity"], ["b", "Einstein", "Special relativity"], ["c", "Newton", "Special relativity"], ], columns=["website", "fact", "object"]) # Initialize with known trustworthiness values dataframe["trustworthiness"] = [0.9, 0.9, 0.5] dataframe["fact_confidence"] = [0.0, 0.0, 0.0] def implication(f1, f2): return 1 # All facts equally support each other finder = TruthFinder(implication, dampening_factor=0.3, influence_related=0.5) # Step 1: Calculate initial confidence from trustworthiness # Uses formula: confidence = sum(-log(1 - trustworthiness)) for all sources claiming fact df = finder.calculate_confidence(dataframe.copy()) print("After calculate_confidence:") print(df[["fact", "fact_confidence"]]) # "Einstein" claimed by a,b (trust=0.9): conf = -2*log(0.1) ≈ 4.605 # "Newton" claimed by c (trust=0.5): conf = -log(0.5) ≈ 0.693 # Step 2: Adjust confidence based on related facts df = finder.adjust_confidence(df) print("\nAfter adjust_confidence (related facts boost each other):") print(df[["fact", "fact_confidence"]]) # Step 3: Apply sigmoid dampening to normalize scores df = finder.compute_fact_confidence(df) print("\nAfter compute_fact_confidence (sigmoid normalization):") print(df[["fact", "fact_confidence"]]) ``` -------------------------------- ### Initialize and Use TruthFinder Source: https://github.com/ishitatakeshi/truthfinder/blob/master/README.md Initializes the TruthFinder model with a custom implication function and parameters for dampening factor and influence of related facts. This is the core step before running the truth discovery process. ```python finder = TruthFinder(implication, dampening_factor=0.8, influence_related=0.6) ``` -------------------------------- ### Train TruthFinder with Sample Data Source: https://context7.com/ishitatakeshi/truthfinder/llms.txt Trains the TruthFinder model using a pandas DataFrame containing conflicting information. This method iteratively computes trustworthiness and confidence scores until convergence or maximum iterations are reached. The output DataFrame includes calculated 'trustworthiness' and 'fact_confidence' scores. ```python import pandas as pd from truthdiscovery import TruthFinder # Prepare input data: conflicting information about scientific discoveries # Columns: website (source), fact (claim), object (topic) dataframe = pd.DataFrame([ ["site_a", "Einstein", "Special relativity"], ["site_a", "Newton", "Universal gravitation"], ["site_b", "Albert Einstein", "Special relativity"], ["site_b", "Galileo Galilei", "Heliocentrism"], ["site_c", "Newton", "Special relativity"], # Wrong claim ["site_c", "Galilei", "Universal gravitation"], # Wrong claim ["site_c", "Einstein", "Heliocentrism"] # Wrong claim ], columns=["website", "fact", "object"]) # Simple implication function (no similarity consideration) def simple_implication(f1, f2): return 1 if f1.lower() == f2.lower() else 0 finder = TruthFinder(simple_implication, dampening_factor=0.3, influence_related=0.5) # Run training # max_iterations: maximum iterations before stopping (default: 200) # threshold: convergence threshold for trustworthiness change (default: 1e-6) # initial_trustworthiness: starting trust score for all sources (default: 0.9) result = finder.train( dataframe, max_iterations=200, threshold=1e-6, initial_trustworthiness=0.9 ) # Output includes two new columns: # - trustworthiness: reliability score of each website # - fact_confidence: confidence score of each fact print(result[["website", "trustworthiness", "fact", "object", "fact_confidence"]]) # Expected output shows site_c with lower trustworthiness due to incorrect claims: # website trustworthiness fact object fact_confidence # 0 site_a 0.862090 Einstein Special relativity 0.894279 # 1 site_a 0.862090 Newton Universal gravitation 0.829901 # 2 site_b 0.862090 Albert Einstein Special relativity 0.894279 # 3 site_b 0.862090 Galileo Galilei Heliocentrism 0.829901 # 4 site_c 0.754878 Newton Special relativity 0.754878 ``` -------------------------------- ### Unit Test for Trustworthiness Update Source: https://context7.com/ishitatakeshi/truthfinder/llms.txt This unit test verifies that the trustworthiness of a website is correctly calculated as the average of its fact confidences. It uses numpy testing utilities for assertions. Ensure pandas, numpy, unittest, and TruthFinder are imported. ```python import math import unittest import numpy as np from numpy.testing import assert_array_equal, assert_array_almost_equal import pandas as pd from truthdiscovery import TruthFinder class TestTruthFinder(unittest.TestCase): def setUp(self): # Use constant implication for predictable testing def implication(f1, f2): return 1 self.dampening_factor = 0.1 self.influence_related = 0.5 self.finder = TruthFinder( implication, dampening_factor=self.dampening_factor, influence_related=self.influence_related ) self.dataframe = pd.DataFrame([ ["a", "Einstein", "Special relativity"], ["a", "Newton", "Universal gravitation"], ["b", "Einstein", "Special relativity"], ["b", "Galilei", "Heliocentrism"], ["c", "Newton", "Special relativity"], ["c", "Galilei", "Universal gravitation"], ["c", "Einstein", "Heliocentrism"] ], columns=["website", "fact", "object"]) self.dataframe["trustworthiness"] = 0.9 self.dataframe["fact_confidence"] = [0.5, 0.3, 0.6, 0.8, 0.1, 0.0, 0.8] def test_trustworthiness_update(self): """Verify trustworthiness is average of fact confidences""" df = self.finder.update_website_trustworthiness(self.dataframe.copy()) # site_a: mean([0.5, 0.3]) = 0.4 assert_array_equal( df.loc[df["website"] == "a", "trustworthiness"], 0.4 ) # site_b: mean([0.6, 0.8]) = 0.7 assert_array_equal( df.loc[df["website"] == "b", "trustworthiness"], 0.7 ) # site_c: mean([0.1, 0.0, 0.8]) = 0.3 assert_array_equal( df.loc[df["website"] == "c", "trustworthiness"], 0.3 ) if __name__ == "__main__": unittest.main() ``` -------------------------------- ### Initialize TruthFinder with Custom Implication Source: https://context7.com/ishitatakeshi/truthfinder/llms.txt Initializes the TruthFinder class with a custom implication function based on TF-IDF similarity and sets hyperparameters for convergence. The implication function defines how related facts influence each other's confidence scores. ```python import pandas as pd import numpy as np from numpy.linalg import norm from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer from truthdiscovery import TruthFinder # Define implication function using TF-IDF similarity vectorizer = TfidfVectorizer(min_df=1) facts = ["Einstein", "Albert Einstein", "Newton", "Galilei", "Galileo Galilei"] vectorizer.fit(facts) def similarity(w1, w2): V = vectorizer.transform([w1, w2]) v1, v2 = np.asarray(V.todense()) return np.dot(v1, v2) / (norm(v1) * norm(v2)) def implication(f1, f2): """Returns implication score from f1 to f2, range [-1, 1]""" return similarity(f1.lower(), f2.lower()) # Initialize TruthFinder # dampening_factor (gamma): controls convergence speed, must be in (0, 1) # influence_related (rho): weight for related facts' influence, must be in [0, 1] finder = TruthFinder( implication=implication, dampening_factor=0.8, # Higher value = faster convergence influence_related=0.6 # Higher value = more influence from related facts ) ``` -------------------------------- ### Create Pandas DataFrame for TRUTHFINDER Source: https://github.com/ishitatakeshi/truthfinder/blob/master/README.md Represents the input data for TRUTHFINDER, where each row contains information about a website, a fact, and the object it pertains to. Ensure the DataFrame columns match 'website', 'fact', and 'object'. ```python dataframe = pd.DataFrame([ ["a", "Einstein", "Special relativity"], ["a", "Newton", "Universal gravitation"], ["b", "Einstein", "Special relativity"], ["b", "Galilei", "Heliocentrism"], ["c", "Newton", "Special relativity"], ["c", "Galilei", "Universal gravitation"], ["c", "Einstein", "Heliocentrism"] ], columns=["website", "fact", "object"] ) ``` -------------------------------- ### Define Implication Function using TF-IDF Source: https://github.com/ishitatakeshi/truthfinder/blob/master/README.md Defines the implication between facts based on their similarity, calculated using TF-IDF vectorization. This function is crucial for TRUTHFINDER to understand how facts support or conflict with each other. Requires 'TfidfVectorizer' and 'numpy'. ```python vectorizer = TfidfVectorizer(min_df=1) vectorizer.fit(dataframe["fact"]) def similarity(f1, f2): V = vectorizer.transform([f1.lower(), f2.lower()]) v1, v2 = np.asarray(V.todense()) return np.dot(v1, v2) / (norm(v1) * norm(v2))) def implication(f1, f2): return similarity(f1, f2) ``` === COMPLETE CONTENT === This response contains all available snippets from this library. No additional content exists. Do not make further requests.